Blog Layout

Why We Don't Do External Awards

Kurt Reilly • Sep 14, 2022

More is only better, until it isn't...

 When we started AwardSpring, we looked at what the competition was doing and at our own experience as students, parents, administrators, and software engineers – and we pledged to always stay focused on simplifying.

 

We want students to see opportunity and a clear path to their education when they log into AwardSpring because the reality is that college life is complex. Today’s students are juggling work, family, rising tuition, housework, you name it – and they deserve something that will make balancing all of this while accessing college easier.


A top priority of ours is to keep students engaged and motivated throughout the scholarship process. We’re in the business of getting more students more funding in an efficient and pain-free way because when scholarship awards make it to students, we all benefit. 

 

While getting an external award is fantastic, sorting through thousands of local, regional, national, and global offers tends to be exhausting. External awards muddy the water, and create an overwhelming experience. 

 

With external awards, students and their families are forever chasing numerous application requirements and deadlines. It’s a tremendous amount of work coming on the heels of an exhaustively charged time: applying for college in the first place. 


We’re not here to deceive students. 


When students are overwhelmed, they are less likely to finish the application process. It’s time to end the practice of burying more-accessible funds beneath a sea of highly competitive, external awards that very few applicants will ever receive.


The reality is that for students to succeed, the scholarship application process must be as clear and simple as possible.

 

When we eliminate tedious work and missed opportunities, qualified applicants get the scholarship dollars they need. Using our robust matching criteria and simplified application process, AwardSpring shows students higher education is attainable and substantial funding exists.

 

We’re here to remove the barriers that keep students from accessing funds. We want students to stay in the game, stay focused on the higher prize, and advance their lives. At AwardSpring, we give students a clear track to their dreams with less work, less frustration, fewer distractions, and more awarding.


AwardSpring Blog

By Jill Murphy 08 Feb, 2024
The FAFSA Simplification Act has brought about significant changes to the financial aid landscape, ushering in a new era in the FAFSA application process. While you’re likely familiar with the details, let's take a moment to recap the key highlights of this transformative legislation. Key Changes: Transition to SAI: The cornerstone of the FAFSA Simplification Act is the replacement of the Expected Family Contribution (EFC) with the Student Aid Index (SAI). This shift aims to provide a more nuanced assessment of financial need, offering flexibility with SAI values, including the possibility of negative figures down to -1500. SAR to FSS: Another notable change is the rebranding of the Student Aid Report (SAR) as the FAFSA Submission Summary (FSS), reflecting the evolving nature of the application process. Negative SAI and PELL Grant Eligibility: One of the significant departures from the previous system is the allowance for negative SAIs. This change necessitates adjustments in how institutions package students for need-based aid. Additionally, PELL grant eligibility will now be determined using criteria separate from the FAFSA and resultant SAI, with the incorporation of IRS tax return data where feasible. As you embark to adapt these new protocols, it's essential to remain informed and proactive in navigating the evolving landscape of higher education finance. As an AwardSpring partner, we’ve made suggestions on how to leverage these changes to better support students on their educational journeys and ensure access to the opportunities they deserve. AwardSpring offers the following recommendations to guide institutions through this process: Recommendation #1: Expected Family Contribution (EFC) to Student Aid Index (SAI) The most consequential change to teams that are putting together Financial Aid packages or making scholarship awarding decisions are the EFC to SAI transition. We recommend you consider one of two options: Option 1: Re-label existing EFC fields as SAI to maintain continuity in data collection If you choose to re-label existing EFC fields, be mindful that doing so may impact historical data analysis, requiring a clear understanding by the consumers of any reports of the transition from EFC to SAI effective the date you make this conversion Option 2: Keep your existing EFC fields for historical purposes and create a new SAI field In this instance, you’ll need a thorough review of all of your qualifications and/or awarding decision-making processes to ensure SAI is being used and EFC is properly retired Notables: In the case where you’re using our SIS Integration feature, we’ll want to coordinate which path you’ve chosen so we can update the import process accordingly AwardSpring currently doesn’t allow our numeric fields to go negative creating a gap between the new SAI protocol and our existing numeric fields. We’ll be addressing this in a March, 2024 release so you can capture negative SAI values, if desired In either case, you’ll want to review scholarship qualifications tied to EFC and/or SAI, and ensure compatibility with the possibility of negative SAI values Recommendation #2: Student Aid Report (SAR) to FAFSA Submission Summary (FSS) Much like repurposing EFC for SAI in our first recommendation, you have another consideration with SAR vs. FSS: Option 1: Evaluate the option of re-labeling existing SAR upload fields as FSS to streamline data collection recognize that this adjustment repurposes the field, necessitating careful consideration of historical data interpretation Option 2: Alternatively, create separate fields to accommodate the transition, albeit with potential rework depending on your unique configuration and whether you utilize SIS Integration Recommendation #3: Other FAFSA Fields There’s more variability here since you may have a wide degree of fields to consider. You should tailor any changes based on the specific field type, whether it’s being used as a qualification, and whether you’d need to make corresponding changes in your SIS. Summary Proactive assessment and strategic adaptation of FAFSA-related questions are crucial to seamlessly transition to the new framework outlined by the FAFSA Simplification Act. By carefully considering these recommendations, you can ensure alignment with regulatory changes while maintaining efficiency and accuracy in financial aid processes. As always, if you’d like to talk with our expert staff, don’t hesitate to reach out to us at support@awardspring.com.
AwardSpring: The #1 Scholarship Management Software
By The AwardSpring Team 22 Sep, 2023
We're absolutely thrilled to announce that AwardSpring has clinched the prestigious #1 spot in the G2 report for Scholarship Management Software, but we didn't stop there!
Show More
Share by: